Congratulations, Ana-Luz and Clara for finally submitting your work at the Cumulus Green competition. Interesting for all to see the submission(s)!

From my perspective, the requirements helped you to get a clearer profile for your project – good luck with it and keen to see more next week!

What it is: Yatai Cart is a response in order to upcycle an unused space between buildings in Fukuoka, “Notes Architects” created a low-cost stand that enables a local coffee shop to be open on weekdays. The do-it-yourself design and low manufacturing cost are the basic principles that insipired the project, consisting of 17 panels made up of square timbers and plywood. It’s main concept was inspired by food talls, salled “Yatai”, and is based on the idea that a primary function of such stalls is to be portable: easy to set up when shops open and easily removed again when they close.
 
Where it is: Fukuoka, Japan. 2018.

Why it is relevant: Yatai Cart enables a cafe to open a coffee stand as an approved bussiness, under the current circumstances, many public spaces are not effectively used in Japan, even though they could be re-activated by implementing existing regulatory restrictions as design opportunities. It contributes to design a long-term vision based on food and creativity for urban neglected spaces in Japan.

 
Contact: Note Architects, http://note-arch.com/
 
  • Open Post in new tab
  • Updated: January 31, 2020 4:31 pm
  • No notifications have been sent for this entry.

Tricycle poster

What it is: La Peruana Coffee is a Pulpaking project that contributes to the sensitive environmental problem in Lima with the development of 100% biodegradable and compostable containers (20 x 25 cm), made from kitchen and agricultural waste (such as rice straw, sugar cane, plantation pseudostem and pineapple leaf) or scrap material resistant to water (such as the coffee shell). The project implementation applies principles of biotechnology to the design of the final packaging, by means of a cardboard machine.
 
Where it is: Lima, Perú.

Why it is relevant: The cultural impact of this project is to generate awareness and environmental education with the use of sustainable packaging, as well as it contributes to sustainable food cycles for it’s capacity of reducing significantly the plastics wholesale distrubution, resusing food waste as a new material to pack edibles.

 
Contact: palominonolascoelizabeth@gmail.com
 
  • Open Post in new tab
  • Updated: January 30, 2020 7:51 pm
  • No notifications have been sent for this entry.
What it is: PermaFungi is a social cooperative based on urban agriculture participatory actions combined with circular economy principles. It’s main goal is to recycle urban organic waste mixed with coffee grounds to grow oyster mushrooms and to produce compost. Additionally, PermaFungi offers various kits to grow mushrooms at home as well as educational workshops regarding the cultivation techniques and permaculture seminars.

Where it is: Brussels, Belgique. 2014.

Why it is relevant: PermaFungi has been created in response to the industrialization of agriculture and the necessity to change contemporary production and consumption models, contributing to urban resilience through a user-oriented approach, by offering stable job opportunities to young unemployed or disadvantaged people as well as contributing to a decentralized mushroom production based on an open network of collaboration and creating high value-added products in a fabrication workshop.

 
 
  • Open Post in new tab
  • Updated: January 30, 2020 7:25 pm
  • No notifications have been sent for this entry.

What it is: Very well written article or food report, answering commonly asked questions about climate change and food

Where it is: Worldwide

Why it is relevant: The article answers many questions an individual might have regarding the climate change and food issue, especially regarding the way they intertwine with each other. Exact stats and explanations are being given about meat, seafood, dairy and suggestions how to eat more plants without entirely giving up on animal sourced products.

URL: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/30/dining/climate-change-food-eating-habits.html?mtrref=www.nytimes.com&assetType=REGIWALL&mtrref=www.nytimes.com&gwh=F0CCD182434F2964EA82AF55B1D4BE2B&gwt=pay&assetType=REGIWALL

 

What it is: Extended nutrition labeling: Nutri-Score, a simplified, expanded nutrition label system on the front of the food packaging. With the Nutri-Score, a five-point scale from A to E shows the overall score for the nutritional value of a product. For this purpose, the number of calories and nutritionally favorable and unfavorable nutrients are offset against each other.

Where it is: France, Belgium and particular brands in Europe

Why it is relevant: The expanded nutritional labeling is intended to give the consumer an actual additional benefit and make the healthy choice an easy choice. For this it is important that the model is well perceived and understood by consumers.
Too much sugar, fats, saturated fatty acids and too much salt are not the only, but important reasons for the development of nutritional diseases such as obesity or cardiovascular diseases.
In addition to a variety of measures to promote a healthy diet, a simplified, expanded nutritional labeling system is an important component of the BMEL’s nutrition policy: if consumers can easily see what a food is like in terms of nutrients, orientation is easier and healthy Choice becomes easier. An understandable representation on the front of the food (front-of-pack) can influence the product selection and thus the nutrient supply in a nutritionally favorable manner.

URL: https://www.bmel.de/DE/Ernaehrung/Kennzeichnung/FreiwilligeKennzeichnung/_Texte/Naehrwertkennzeichnungs-Modelle-MRI-Bericht.html#doc12323462bodyText1

What it is: Copper Branch plant-based power food, a restaurant focusing on plant-based foods.

Where it is: US, Canda, France

Why it is relevant: Plant-based diets offer all the necessary protein, fats, carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals for optimal health, and are often higher in fiber and phytonutrients. More and more people in North America are adopting a plant-based diet, or grow increasingly interested in the matter, so Copper Branch, being one of many, decided to capitalize on the wholesome, plant-based, non-GMO, and fast-casual restaurant market.

URL: https://eatcopperbranch.com/

 

  • Open Post in new tab
  • Updated: January 30, 2020 4:04 pm
  • No notifications have been sent for this entry.

Hi David, sorry the delay, attached the poster. In the poster is the text of why, what and how. 

Poster_FF

What it is: Buy when you want and what you want: fruits and vegetables, cheese, meat, bread, drinks and much more … An app with a flexible option to buy with no membership fee or minimum order value. 

Where it is: Europe

Why is relevant: The community of farmers could sell their products in fair prices including the biodiversity options that the Supermarkets don’t want to buy or pay. Buying in this apps support the farmers to grow more biodiversity products, with help with quality soils, better harvest, minerals etc. 

URL: https://marktschwaermer.de/de

Food is increasingly getting on the agenda of design and designers. And there is need for new approaches!

In this international project, we will research and analyse structures and processes related to food production, distribution and consumption in (future) cities (Cologne/Taipei).

We will develop possibilities of future approaches, especially in the context of increasing digitization (AI, IoT, blockchain, traceability, bait to plate, farm to fork) – and question them critically.

  • How can we design a different relation to food, its ingredients and values, its production and culture, its habits and processes?
  • How can we create new relations and values to ingredients of food?
  • How can we connect (us to) different stakeholders, especially to build relations between farmer/producer and consumer.

A part of the project team – max. 6 students – will be able to work in Taipei for a week in November, supported by students from SCID Taipei and the project group in Cologne. Details will be clarified in the first project meeting.

In Cologne, we work together with local experts and stakeholders.

At the end of the semester, both the analysis and drafts / prototypes will be presented.

In the project we refer to the UN Sustainable Development Goals, in particular to SDG 11 and 12. Due to the topic, it might be possible to submit the results to the Cumulus Green Award (and I will encourage and support you to do so).

We will approach the project by questions we want to explore. In the beginning, we will have the opportunity to find a huge variety of questions and then discuss them – amongst us and with others . in order to find out the most relevant ones. Relevant in terms of the need to approach them and relevant to approach them from the perspective of design.

Pre-meeting: if you have questions or want to make sure that you are really in the project – or want to influence the character of the project even before it started please try to join our pre-meeting on Thursday September 26 at 12.30

First official meeting: This is mandatory for all that want to join – it will be on Tuesday October 22 at 10.00. In this meeting I want to see what your specific interest in this project is – so please subscribe to this space, contribute with some relevant questions and maybe cases as well…

Regular meetings: The regular meetings are always on Tuesday at 10.00. As I mentioned due to some travel activities we won’t meet every Tuesday, but there will be weeks where we meet twice or longer during the Tuesday meeting. There is a GoogleDoc with all our meetings (always updated). If you are not available we can arrange to connect via zoom – but always let me know before. 

Taiwan trip: the workshop in Taiwan is scheduled for November 18-23. The core group not traveling to Taipei will proceed meeting here and we will remotely collaborate via our KISDspace and zoom (see above).

We can learn a lot from existing cases and studies. Here we are collecting relevant cases how digitalisation  influences and affects food farming, production, distribution and consumption. How farmers/producers are connected to consumers, the rural to the urban.

Cases are structured around 3 core questions: What it is, Where it is and Why it is relevant. In addition, cases have tags / keywords to made them more accessible and findable. It would be great to use the comment function about the use of cases to create additional information

Here we will collect interesting experts: individuals, organisations or initiatives who are doing something we consider valuable in the context of the project. They can be (preferrably) from the area Cologne or Taipei with the purpose to meet them for an interview, invite them for a talk or a workshop, or to go for a visit or a field trip.

This is the page where we share our digital communication – in this case video messages between Cologne and Taipei to figure out what’s the best way to keep in touch. And for live connections please use https://zoom.us/j/5505005500

We decided that it is necessary and of benefit for your individual works to extend the project and present on Feb 6 or Feb 7. We will only show elaborated work that went through enough iterations so if there is still a lot of work to do please use the opportunities to come to the meetings with David and me well prepared with updated designs. Tomorrow David will (start to) meet you around 10.

So this is what you will need to do (should be clear after the Tuesday session anyway). And please check in for the meeting with David, especially Kalia, Maria, Yasmine and Matea should share updated work.

  • Artefact of your concept: This is the most crucial thing. The artefact will be a physical object that you exhibit at your exhibition element. It should not envision or explain your process (unless you would suggest this for the “real” setting of your project as well). It requires a certain maturity and formal as well as aesthetic qualities. It should be well-thought in terms if functionalities. It will / might be an entry point to access your concept and to go deeper via the User story or the system map.
  • Content: We still use the GoogleDoc to collect the text that will be used for the poster of your exhibition element as well as for the presentation slides. Please have a look I gave additional comments to all of you. I also added a line about data / information to support the concept – as we were talking about this for quite a few weeks.
  • Posters for your exhibition element
    • Everybody is aware which type of user story and system map to show, most are working on it.
    • We still have to see which photos or drawings you want to share.
    • Use the template plakat Ordner for the 2 posters (front / backside of the exhibition element). Additional posters can be created if necessary.
    • Content for the posters explaining your project and process at our GoogleDoc (see above) Deadline Jan 24, 9 AM, you will get feedback from me on that Friday morning
    • Poster as PDF based on the template -> Deadline Jan 28 meeting sample printout, to be reworked based on feedback of that session
    • Final visual material for the posters -> Deadline Feb 3
    • Final posters printed out -> Deadline Feb 4, 1 PM
  • 3 cases every participant, according to the requirements shared in our KISDspace
  • Exhibition element
    • Draft what you will need and what exactly you will show -> Deadline meeting Jan 28
    • All: planning what goes where, David will coordinate
  • Shared PDF presentation
    • 2 slides each group based on template (will come from David and me), content is based on material you shared for the poster, will be discussed in Feb 4 meeting
  • Exhibition set-up
    • one day before the presentation, so either Feb 5 or 6, to be decided if the presentation date is set. I would prefer Feb 6 (if there should be presentations on that day). One day before the presentations all will join a rehearsal in the afternoon.

After today´s intense discussions with all of you I am looking forward to the next steps from your side. Some are really very far and it will be about how to select the most important things, how to best communicate them and use the time to think about building meaningful new relations / connections between individual aspects you developed. For some still many things are vague and I have just heard things but not seen what you think of.

So the next days will be really important to decide whether we all can make it to present as announced and agreed on Jan 31 or if we can / should go later (Feb 6). It should be clear for all that we have to create a meaningful coherence in each project and thus create a meaningful presentation and exhibition as a next and final step.

We will see – so please be very considerate about the next steps, deliveries and next steps I shared and discussed today.

There is a regional contact I received from MEDes student Carolin Schabbing, the Regionalwert AG https://www.regionalwert-rheinland.de/ – it is very interesting to see what they are doing (worth to explore!) – could it be of help for you to be connected to them by Carolin? Let me know.

 

For today, I am missing Kalia as well as Anna-Luz/Clara. Let me know if you arrive, otherwise I will join Maria at 11.

Lots of things to work on now!

 

Hope you had a good session yesterday! As I will be in the Scottish Highlands until Sunday I need to give you some remote comments (general ones9 in order to make or keep you productive until next Tuesday. Lets put it like this; next Tuesday we have to decide what we will show and exhibit and from now on you should block four days a week for working on the project (if excited, more of course).

Please keep on reworking the table. I made some general comments on the categories we were asking for.

Together with David I will start to give more detailed individual feedback in the next year. Can you please all share a photo of your planned artefact by tomorrow / THURSDAY so that you can get feedback and iterate before our meeting next TUESDAY. A

After the tutoring, we discussed how we will shape the final 30-minute presentation/exhibition. At the start, prof. Heidkamp and I will give a 5-minute introduction to the theme(s) of the project to set the context right. Afterwards, each project gets exactly 1 minute to present. 5+8=13 This will give the visitors enough time to go around and ask you things. 

Now for next Tuesday (14/01) we will meet altogether at 10:00 and practice the elevator pitch already, as it’s a process, and it forces you to condense your project. So again, the name ‘elevator pitch’ reflects the idea that it should be possible to deliver the summary in the time-span of an elevator ride. Each team will give a 1-minute oral pitch to the rest of the class! I will time it, and after we can give some feedback. (a tip, I would write a little script)

After I want to continue the discussion on how we are doing the final presentation. We have already said that everyone would have 2 posters (at least) and present their physical artefact onto the platform of KISD’s exhibition systems. I’ll try to get one in class on Tuesday so you can feel it.

By Tuesday (14/01), we ask you to fill out this spreadsheet (in which you will find the table below) with information about your project. So we can gather the condensed content of the different projects in one place. 

Topic / Project Name
Question / Hypothesis
Problem / Challenge Definition
Place in Cologne
Abstract of the Project
Keywords
Relevant Cases
Research Methods used
Stakeholder and specific Local Partners

See you on Tuesdayi!

EDIT: Also! Here is the Schwarzplan of Cologne in PDF. This is a black and white plan of the greater Cologne. You can download it with the password fcf. Thanks Philipp!
There are many different ones. I am still downloading the folders to look which one is most useful but my suuperslow internet says it will take me another 2 hours. For the ones interested, have a look too and maybe share which one would be of most value to us.

2020! Yippiee

Let’s start the new year with a good productive meeting tomorrow 😉

Every group is asked to choose a slot again here on this spreadsheet (the second row, under 01/07). Above that, we are having a general meeting from 14h-15h30 where everyone should be present so we can discuss the proceedings of the next weeks collectively. 

See you tomorrow!!

Please prepare a schedule for tomorrow in order to make sure everybody of you has its 20min slot to present and discuss the current status according to last weeks requirements. As this is the last meeting in this year it will be important to be on the same page. As 228 is way bigger than 303 it would be fine for me to meet there, I leave it up to you if you want to travel again to my office 311. So we are 8 groups / topics this means 3 hours work fine for 8×20 mins.

Please prepare a schedule with time / project name so that I know who will shop up when.

If there should be any important things to clarify before tomorrow please make a posting comment.

Hi everyone, I have uploaded the recordings in this Drive folder, if you’d like to listen again to the discussion. (Sorry Matea, something went wrong with your recording but I’m sure you have good notes 😉 ) Some are still uploading but they should all be there soon. 

Concerning Design Research Methods.. Prof. Heidkamp already mentioned to some of the groups that the use of Cultural Probes, or Design Probes, could be an appropriate method to get visual and valuable information from your target group. Probing is a method mainly used in Human-Computer Interaction and User-Centred Design. This paper of my former teacher at Aalto, Tuuli Mattelmäki who wrote her doctoral thesis on Design Probes, gives a good overview of what it is, critically reflects how it is a useful method, and some further tips and tricks when applying it to your own work. There are no concrete pragmatic guides on how to do it, as you’ll need to figure out yourself how this method could inform and help your project. Because again, these are tools, so treat them loosely.

About interviewing techniques… Interviewing a person of interest might seem evident but as all of you know, to get interesting answers you need to ask the right questions. How to prepare an interview? Have it structured? Or semi-structured? Open? Focused? Should I bring artefacts? Maps? Models? Go for a walk? Meet in an office? Go for a coffee? Should I record it? Transcribe it? Take notes? Do I need to ask for consent?
Depending on what you want to find out and who you are speaking to, there are different ways to prepare or not prepare 😉 There are different ways of framing your questions depending on what you want to find out. 

I am not an expert on this, but I’d be happy to look over your research/interview strategy and assist you in fine-tuning it. Therefore, I suggest an open meeting Monday (16/12) afternoon from 13h-15h for the ones interested, in which I will be in room 228 to listen and help out. And share some examples. But then, I would like you to already prepare and show me what you want to find out, who you will address, and how you want to go about it.

For the ones interested in learning about and using Design Probes, we can also use Monday afternoon to cover that. If Monday seems an inconvenient time, I can also offer extra time Tuesday afternoon.

One final wish concerning your research: Ask each other who you will contact and interview, and team up/share your information. If there is a shared expert or stakeholder, for example, Neuland, go to the interview or meeting with a member of each interested team. It would be a pity if those organisations/people would be contacted separately. So what do you have in common? Take ownership of the room!

Dear teams, we are happy to announce that we are moving from R303 to a bigger room, R228! Everyone should from now on be on the key-list for R228. This is on the second floor, taking a left when coming out of the elevator.

This means that the individual meetings tomorrow will take place in R228.. See you there. Also, I saw that not everyone has picked a slot yet, please do so if you want to continue with this project. See you tomorrow!

Thanks for making it through the long meeting!

Everyone knows now who is working on what, this means that the final project-teams/individuals should be clear by next week. I have set up tutoring slots for this Thursday (05/12) for those who want. This extra tutoring would be especially of value if you are unsure of your project (or team or …) as this is your last chance to tweak your topic before it needs to be crystalised next week Tuesday (10/12). Please come by, we can chat about it 🙂 Choose a slot here.

For next week on Tuesday (10/12), we will work with tutoring-slots again but then with prof. Heidkamp and me, every project-team/individual needs to book in a slot here. To enable a more profound discussion, there are 4 things we ask you to take to the meeting. 

  1. Scenario – (Storyboard, sketches, pictures, …) Show us your idea. The goal is to start conceptually shaping the ideas, while simultaneously doing research. Go very concrete, think about a place, and the actors in that place. So you can zoom out – open up again after. Not every element needs to be defined, nor is the scenario fixed. Let’s iterate this over the next weeks. 
  2. Data Ecosystem – As a common denominator (criteria), every project needs to situate itself in the data ecosystem. What does that mean? When mapping your project, show what kind of data could be gathered. Ideally marking a variety of points in your concept where data could be generated, without considering the meaning/value of that data too much yet.
  3. Experts – Show us which experts you want to approach, when you will hear them and how they can inform your project.
  4. Conversation Artefact – Bring something tangible!! A mock-up, a model, … of the product(s), service, … you are wanting to design. Of course this can (and should be) low-fidelity, but this is an exercise to materialise our conversations and to start thinking through making!! This should be a fun, designerly part, so just do stuff and try things out. There’s no right or wrong as long as you bring something.

Finally, we talked about criteria, which now hang up in the room, they are there to be challenged and expanded upon but take them into account when defining your concepts!

Yihaaaa! Let’s get through this wordy/fuzzy phase and go into a more tangible fuzzy phase! 😉 Prof. Heidkamp, you have anything to add? See you soon!