What it is: Slow Food Foundation support projects which involve producers and local communities growing biodiversity and traditional food. Some of the projects are: 

The Ark of Taste identifies and catalogues quality food products at risk of extinction. Today products on board number more than 5,000 from over 120 countries. 

The Slow Presidia: The Presidia sustain quality production at risk of extinction, protect unique regions and ecosystems, recover traditional processing methods, safeguard native breeds and local plant varieties

Where it is: around 100 years

Why is relevant: The Foundation’s projects are tools to promote a model of agriculture that is based on local biodiversity and respect for the land and the local culture, is in harmony with the environment and aims to provide food sovereignty and access to good, clean and fair food for all communities.

URL: https://www.fondazioneslowfood.com/en/

ING_libretto_arca

I’m still working on the majority, but that is the current version.

poster_draft

Tricycle package

As discussed, here is my poster: plakat_Hyperfood. The back ist just a concept, I have to rearrange everything, but just for the fist hand …

WHAT: The Hyperfood is an approach to redesign the traditional distribution system for local and seasonal food by implementing it into existing infrastructure and using environmentally friendly technologies. Local farms are connected through an underground tube system that transports capsules with pneumatic power to pick up points that keep food cold with a minimum use of energy due to the fact that they are placed underground. To be easily accessible and so that several people can benefit from the system pick up points are placed in the most condensed and easy reachable parts of the city.

WHY: Todays food distribution system does not work on his highest efficiency level due to many touchpoints between producer and consumer as packaging, logistics, transportation and similar. Additionally, the volume of traffic increases especially in densely populated parts of the cities and traffic jams occur due to freight transportation. Consequently, emissions are increasing. As cities have to deal with less infrastructure in the future and the significance of technologies and digitalization is still rising, a new way of transportation is necessary.

HOW: My future approach of transportation tries to tackle these obstacles by implementing an underground transportation system into CGN’s existing infrastructure as unused tunnels from the roman empire or KVB and used metro tunnels. Since the capsules in which the food is transported have a capacity of 6kg and thus a diameter of about 30cm, the transport system is place-saving and can be placed in tunnels, even in those that are still in use. The capsules are transported from the farms to the pick-up points with the use of air pressure that pushes the capsules trough the underground tube system. Hubs between the tubes and the microchip, which is implemented in each capsule and that stores the target location of the capsule enable the capsule to reach the desired destination.  The whole food ordering process is managed through a digital platform where farmers can insert their daily offers and consumers can place their appropriate orders, track their order, see recipes corresponding to the farmers offers, book a farm visit, rate farms and the food and pay digital.

What it is: Foodsharing is an internet platform that gives private individuals, traders and producers the opportunity to offer or collect surplus food free of charge. This is done in FairTeilern which has set up rooms in publicly accessible places in various parts of the city, such as here in the Bürgerzentrum Ehrenfeld e.V. The aim is to share surplus food with others instead of throwing it away and making it available free of charge to anyone interested.

The core idea is people sharing food. There should be no money involved, because sharing also has an ethical dimension. In this way we give food an idealistic value again, because it is more than just a commodity.

Where it is: Cologne, Germany

Why it is relevant: The FairTeiler can act as an example for how food sharing and resource conservation can work in cities. It is also a good start for everyone to use their remaining food wisely instead of throwing it away. It is both money and resource saving and at the same time environmentally friendly

URL: https://foodsharing.koeln/?page_id=123

POSTER_SPEISEWALD1

Die Tafel

What it is: Die Tafel–The charitable boards create a balance: they collect surplus, qualitatively perfect food and distribute it to socially and economically disadvantaged people. With their fast and unbureaucratic help, the Tafeln alleviate the consequences of poverty in a rich society – and stand for solidarity and humanity.

Where it is: Germany-organisation

Why it is relevant: The table also works with surplus food that is still of high quality and edible. However, in this case, support is given to the needy who often cannot afford the weekly shopping for their family.

URL: https://www.tafel.de/

 

Hey guys

Check out the new poster here. The pdf also has an A5 factsheet where we put the keywords, stakeholders etc. which will go below the poster. Now I am going to take the content of the poster you will post today, and put it into the new template. And then give the poster back to you if you want to change anything. We have decided to give the user story appropriate space, but it should make ideal use of these dimensions: 

380mm by 540mm or 38cm by 54cm

That’s the amount of space you get on your poster for your user story. Please have your final one ready by Wednesday evening 29/01 So I can put them in the new poster on Thursday. (As you notice, quite some attention now is going to your question and text How/What/Why, so it might be worth spending some extra time on that!)

On Monday 03/02 prof. HK and I want to meet you in R240 at 10:00, with the exact built-up exhibition pieces you are using. Every student can get the key for room 058, so organize yourself and get your exh. systems at 09:00. We can then shuffle the pieces around and make good use of the space (and clean it up when necessary).

Let’s get readyyyyy! I have asked for the foodlab on Thursday for a final dinner together, after a hopefully successful presentation 😉

The Good Food

What it is: The Good Food sells products of all kinds that would otherwise have been destroyed as waste. The owner (Nicole)  goes into fields after they have been harvested and collects the vegetables left behind. Some of them are deemed too big, some too small, some just too ugly to sell. In her shop, the organic food then becomes accessible to everyone using a “pay what you think” system. Buyers can also find non-perishable products from big manufacturers which have passed their sell-by dates.

Where it is: Köln-Ehrenfeld

Why it is relevant: We planned a cooperation with The Good Food concerning the transportation of the vegetables from the farmer to the shops. The shared costs of renting a van, pay for petrol or buying a new vehicle would lower the costs on both sides, make the process easier, faster and products cheaper for the consumer.

URL: https://www.the-good-food.de/

 

NeuLand

What it is: NeuLand is an urban community garden that is using an uncultivated area by planting diverse vegetables, fruits and other plants in transportable boxes. They grow in transportable boxes, because the soil is contaminated and therefore unusable for gardening and also their time is limited, as there are probably some plans coming up in the next years for construction concepts from Stadt Köln.  

Where it is: Bayenthal, Köln

Why it is relevant: The area they use fits perfectly for putting our concept of Echt Essbar into place. As the area they use is the city’s property and they don’t mind sharing a small part of the space, it gives Echt Essbar a relaxed and natural environment to settle in. Also Neuland profits from a cooperation, since they might get more attention for their own projects.

URL: http://www.neuland-koeln.de/

 

Food is increasingly getting on the agenda of design and designers. And there is need for new approaches!

In this international project, we will research and analyse structures and processes related to food production, distribution and consumption in (future) cities (Cologne/Taipei).

We will develop possibilities of future approaches, especially in the context of increasing digitization (AI, IoT, blockchain, traceability, bait to plate, farm to fork) – and question them critically.

  • How can we design a different relation to food, its ingredients and values, its production and culture, its habits and processes?
  • How can we create new relations and values to ingredients of food?
  • How can we connect (us to) different stakeholders, especially to build relations between farmer/producer and consumer.

A part of the project team – max. 6 students – will be able to work in Taipei for a week in November, supported by students from SCID Taipei and the project group in Cologne. Details will be clarified in the first project meeting.

In Cologne, we work together with local experts and stakeholders.

At the end of the semester, both the analysis and drafts / prototypes will be presented.

In the project we refer to the UN Sustainable Development Goals, in particular to SDG 11 and 12. Due to the topic, it might be possible to submit the results to the Cumulus Green Award (and I will encourage and support you to do so).

We will approach the project by questions we want to explore. In the beginning, we will have the opportunity to find a huge variety of questions and then discuss them – amongst us and with others . in order to find out the most relevant ones. Relevant in terms of the need to approach them and relevant to approach them from the perspective of design.

Pre-meeting: if you have questions or want to make sure that you are really in the project – or want to influence the character of the project even before it started please try to join our pre-meeting on Thursday September 26 at 12.30

First official meeting: This is mandatory for all that want to join – it will be on Tuesday October 22 at 10.00. In this meeting I want to see what your specific interest in this project is – so please subscribe to this space, contribute with some relevant questions and maybe cases as well…

Regular meetings: The regular meetings are always on Tuesday at 10.00. As I mentioned due to some travel activities we won’t meet every Tuesday, but there will be weeks where we meet twice or longer during the Tuesday meeting. There is a GoogleDoc with all our meetings (always updated). If you are not available we can arrange to connect via zoom – but always let me know before. 

Taiwan trip: the workshop in Taiwan is scheduled for November 18-23. The core group not traveling to Taipei will proceed meeting here and we will remotely collaborate via our KISDspace and zoom (see above).

We can learn a lot from existing cases and studies. Here we are collecting relevant cases how digitalisation  influences and affects food farming, production, distribution and consumption. How farmers/producers are connected to consumers, the rural to the urban.

Cases are structured around 3 core questions: What it is, Where it is and Why it is relevant. In addition, cases have tags / keywords to made them more accessible and findable. It would be great to use the comment function about the use of cases to create additional information

Here we will collect interesting experts: individuals, organisations or initiatives who are doing something we consider valuable in the context of the project. They can be (preferrably) from the area Cologne or Taipei with the purpose to meet them for an interview, invite them for a talk or a workshop, or to go for a visit or a field trip.

This is the page where we share our digital communication – in this case video messages between Cologne and Taipei to figure out what’s the best way to keep in touch. And for live connections please use https://zoom.us/j/5505005500

Here I am sharing the criteria for the Taipei workshop -. and of course they are related to our work here. So please have them in mind as criteria for your individual project topics to work on.

CRITERIA

(Future) speculations about food and the city will lead to countless opportunities. In order to narrow down your focus and being able to relate your outcomes to each other a set of criteria for your work and our evaluation are set.

 

  • Try to connect people, places and activities in the city with the rural
  • Connect/relate people to food and build communities
  • Create awareness of food/ingredient quality, relate people to food, engage, educate
  • Provide (useful, necessary, feasible and digestible) data and information about food/ingredients and farming products, make intelligent use of information technology
  • Try to relate production and consumption in a closer way!
  • Use very characteristic and specific places in the city (abandoned spaces, green rooftops, (pop-up) restaurants, markets… to make things tangible
  • Focus on agriculture (fruits, vegetables, crops etc.) as this allows the biggest flexibility in involvement and scalability
  • Find possible distinction criteria of your product and create a narrative relevant for consumers.

 

 

And, some hints for your work:

  • Look at Community Supported Agriculture – how can this support (or plug into) the individual projects?
  • Decrease the middle-men in the supply chain
  • Use of digital technology to improve solutions
  • Empowering local products, people
  • Work towards solutions that work in a respectful (check stakeholders!) and scalable (other places, global demand) way
  • Searching alternatives for mass-production and industrial food production 
  • Investigate opportunities for Restaurant / street stall / pop-up food places as a touchpoint where new experiences emerge

Choose farming products which allow enough opportunity for intelligent disposition and re-use (or at least check if there are any) e.g. rice, coffee etc.

Tomorrow we need to fix the six groups for Taipei. As discussed on Friday it would be beneficial for all of us if a) the KISDies in the 6 Taipei groups are both bringing in their experience & interest and push their topic forward in Taipei – with the help of the other students in the intense week and if b) there might be the opportunity to team up with the other 7 students staying here in Cologne. This would be a great match, I don´t know if it will work for all – but I suggest!

As finding the topics seems to be a catch 22 we came up on Friday with the following overview:


Group 1 and 2 Consume: Designing a new restaurant experience in Taipei
In the future, the concepts of restaurants will proceed to change. You will work on this topic here in Taipei, being open to re-think your understanding and concept of “restaurant”. You will think of new types of restaurants. Where would such a restaurant be? What would be the experience, depending on a very specific type of food they are offering? What type of specific products would be available? How will it connect to citizen and farmer? Which information is relevant for the food, for the cultivation process, which communities might emerge? What do people (need to) know about the food they eat?  Are restaurants embedded in (specific) communities?
1. Street stall / pop-up Sarah
2. Restaurant / farm to plate Maxime

Group 3 and 4 Distribute: Designing a new market / retail experience to meet emerging customer´s needs 
Where will it be? What are best places and why? What will be “sold”? How will this match new shopping behaviors you see emerging? How do they deal with waste? What will be sold? Which information is available about the products and how will people use this information, get in touch with it? What is the new experience?
3. Food market experience / pop-up store Mattea
4. Food bank Jeldrik

Group 5 and 6 Produce: Designing a concept for new farming activities for emerging urban farming activities 
How to connect citizen and farmer, what is the benefit for them? How can food be monitored? Which data are / might be available? How to build and strengthen communities, which communities emerge? How and what to share and work together?
5. Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) outside of Taipei Clara ( / Sarah?)
6. Connecting consumers to farmer through data Anna Luz
and / or optionally: Urban Farming in a specific location in Taipei


So the challenge for tomorrow will be to adapt your project title (according to the questions you had / I revised) according to the above mentioned 6 subtopics. If there will be a shift from your side – perfect, but let´s see that we are covering the most crucial things and that we stay in the three domains.Hope that works for you…but I am sure.

 

https://vimeo.com/172998484

What it is: Food Connect’s vision is to create a world where everyone has access to healthy, fresh, ecologically-grown food that is fair to growers, eaters, and the planet. They want to transform the food system, and they believe the next step towards this vision is to create a working local food hub for the regional food economy, that is owned by the community. “We exist to create fair and prosperous regional and urban food economies because we believe that changing the way we source and distribute food is fundamental to solving the world’s most pressing social and ecological problems.”
Together with over 500 of their local community, customers, farmers and supporters, they  raised over $2 million in an equity crowdfunding campaign in late 2018 to purchase the warehouse they rented for over 12 years. This led to Australia’s first community-owned local food hub, the Food Connect Shed, providing the infrastructure to create a stable market for  farmers, completely divorced from market forces, and to create a home to many ethical food entrepreneurs. The founder Rob is now well ensconced in his new role as Shed Director, and you’ll often find him giving group tours of all the tenancies and exciting them with the grand vision!

Where it is:Brisbane / Australia

Why it is relevant: They support local farmers, engage with an interested food community in the cities, work on products and change the delivery mechanisms. Over the years, the community was grown, new (high quality and pricy) products emerged. In addition, the video above gives a good first explanation about food chain mechanisms and global food challenges.

URL: https://foodconnect.com.au/

Q1: How can we design / change the situation of “common meals” at restaurants or in food stalls in order to connect people more to the food (its origin, its culture, its value…) they are eating?

Q2: How can we design settings where people in cities connect to local and seasonal food and their production context? How could we use data and digital media to increase the possible impact of people engaged in CSA for them and their friends / community (both in relation to the ingredients used and the more efficient / less waste use)?

Q3: How can we design and use data about food / ingredients to support people in selecting specific regional and seasonal food? This question should deal with different retail situations of food and work with specific examples of organic food allowing to connect to the origin of the food and dealing with different layers of information depending of the interest of the customer.
It adresses different situations with different contextual information needs.

Q4: Looking at regional and seasonal food, what are the opportunities to reduce or avoid packaging in retail situations in cities but in the same way provide necessary information about the products (goes together with Q3)? Are there services that enable change of the existing patterns of shopping regional and seasonal food in supermarkets (e.g. through engaging with the regional farmers through digital channels / platforms or through building communities)? Which new experiences and retail channels might emerge supporting local farmers?

Q5: Which possibilities emerge through emerging data technologies (like block chain) to establish a stronger relationship between people living in large cities and the food they buy and consume? Both types, regional and distant food will be explored for ways to connect both to the food and their production, cultivation, their value and the engaged people. What could this mean for interested people in the city?

Q6: How can social media and digital platforms be used to create local communities of people living in big cities sharing an interest in local and regional food? Can specific characteristics of food culture support this process and which type of services or processes might emerge?

Q7: How can we learn from the two phases of production and consumption in the food cycle in a way to better connect producers and consumers of food through a digital platform and build urban communities more aware of the value and origin of food, appreciating and enjoying food?

Q8: How can CSA around Cologne and Taipei be more efficient and appealing to a broader community / audience, supported through activities and new services based on available data and digital platforms? How would this change the work at CSA (or new types of farming) in a sustainable way? Which new roles for both urban citizen and farmer emerge?

Q9: How can we create value in limited availability of (local, seasonal) products, making them special and appreciate its very quality? What type of food might be a good example for that?

Q10: How could the street stall culture in Taipei can become a unique pioneer (and new best-practice) in connecting to peri-urban food production / farms? Can the farm-to-plate principle, currently applied to more pricy restaurant, be applied to this very common type of “eating out”? Street stalls might be satellites or pop-ups of a farm.

Q12: Which non-food products made of upcycled food waste relate to the city / urban context are able to tell a story about its origin through digital information layers? How could the experience be? (How) can it be a strong story supporting a brand?

Q13:Which types of narratives using food / ingredients / cultivation / production data are able to create a relation to the product (and a strong user experience)? It might be the process of growing, or taking care, of the use of fertilizers etc. that can be “shared”.

Q14: How could urban citizen connect through local / peri-urban farming products and which new types of supply chain / distribution could emerge?

I can highly recommend to listen (sorry, German only) to the following DLF podcasts / programs:

For sure the Global Food Summit (mentioned quite often) is a valuable ressource as qwell.

Please have alook at this workshop draft for the Taipei week. It is relevant for all of us:

For the six students leaving as we will have six teams in Taipei and each of the KISDstudents will be in one of the teams supporting the process, sharing insights we achieved – and nudging the team in a direction that is of help for our overall project goal (and maybe each KISD teammmebers individual goal and project). So it might make sense to take this into consideration when working on your topics.

For the seven students staying in Cologne it is relevant as you will be ably to benefit from the work done in Taiwan – and help through contributing with existing research and preparation you have done up to now. You will recognize possible connections I built to the questions you developed (I hope).

So this is a part of the draft I am currently developing with David:

DRAFT SCID-KISD workshop Future Cities: Food

< Introduction>

In the workshop, you will build six teams working on three main topics:

  1. Designing a new restaurant experience in Taipei (CONSUME)
    Where would such a restaurant be? What type of specific products would be available? How will it connect to citizen and farmer? Which information is relevant for the food, for the cultivation process, which communities might emerge? Which stakeholders are involved?
  • Street stall / pop-up
  • Restaurant / farm to plate

2. Designing a new market / retail experience to meet emerging customer´s needs (DISTRIBUTE)
Where will it be? What are best places and why? What will be sold? How ill this match new shopping behaviors you see emerging? How do they deal with waste? What will be sold? Which information is available about the products and how will people use this information, get in touch with it? What is the new experience? Which stakeholders are involved?

  • Food market experience
  • Pop-up store

3. Designing a concept for new farming activities for emerging urban farming activities (PRODUCE)
How to connect citizen and farmer, what is the benefit for them? Which stakeholders are involved? How can food be monitored? How to build and strengthen communities, which communities emerge? How and what to share and work together?

  • Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) outside of Taipei
  • Urban Farming in a specific location in Taipei

Feedback to the 13 questions

Finally I went through all of your contributions, made comments and came up with suggestions. Please find here a PDF that might be a bit better readable for you. Enjoy!

Please find below all your questions in an overview and my respective feedback. I put that in one document to have a better connection and overview. Please note that all questions are starting points for projects where different results can emerge. In most cases it might be very useful to focus on a specific type of food / vegetable / farm, a specific product, a specific place to start working. For all the question key insights of the cases you presented yesterday and knowledge about the phases will be very helpful.

Up to now, you have done a really good job to investigate the really broad topic (feed the world in 2050…) and come up with questions that are of interest for you, that are feasible to address and highly relevant. Some are similar, but you can either team up or work on the similar questions in a different way etc. – no problem. Please do not forget the wonderful Cumulus Green Competition – I see quite a few opportunities for you!

I tried to relate the questions to the activities and domains of consume/r, produce/r or product  and distribute/ion

Here you find a summary of the core questions I see:

Q1: How can we design / change the situation of “common meals” at restaurants or in food stalls in order to connect people more to the food (its origin, its culture, its value…) they are eating?

Q2: How can we design settings where people in cities connect to local and seasonal food and their production context? How could we use data and digital media to increase the possible impact of people engaged in CSA for them and their friends / community (both in relation to the ingredients used and the more efficient / less waste use)?

Q3: How can we design and use data about food / ingredients to support people in selecting specific regional and seasonal food? This question should deal with different retail situations of food and work with specific examples of organic food allowing to connect to the origin of the food and dealing with different layers of information depending of the interest of the customer.
It adresses different situations with different contextual information needs.

Q4: Looking at regional and seasonal food, what are the opportunities to reduce or avoid packaging in retail situations in cities but in the same way provide necessary information about the products (goes together with Q3)? Are there services that enable change of the existing patterns of shopping regional and seasonal food in supermarkets (e.g. through engaging with the regional farmers through digital channels / platforms or through building communities)? Which new experiences and retail channels might emerge supporting local farmers?

Q5: Which possibilities emerge through emerging data technologies (like block chain) to establish a stronger relationship between people living in large cities and the food they buy and consume? Both types, regional and distant food will be explored for ways to connect both to the food and their production, cultivation, their value and the engaged people. What could this mean for interested people in the city?

Q6: How can social media and digital platforms be used to create local communities of people living in big cities sharing an interest in local and regional food? Can specific characteristics of food culture support this process and which type of services or processes might emerge?

Q7: How can we learn from the two phases of production and consumption in the food cycle in a way to better connect producers and consumers of food through a digital platform and build urban communities more aware of the value and origin of food, appreciating and enjoying food?

Q8: How can CSA around Cologne and Taipei be more efficient and appealing to a broader community / audience, supported through activities and new services based on available data and digital platforms? How would this change the work at CSA (or new types of farming) in a sustainable way? Which new roles for both urban citizen and farmer emerge?

Q9: How can we create value in limited availability of (local, seasonal) products, making them special and appreciate its very quality? What type of food might be a good example for that?

Q10: How could the street stall culture in Taipei can become a unique pioneer (and new best-practice) in connecting to peri-urban food production / farms? Can the farm-to-plate principle, currently applied to more pricy restaurant, be applied to this very common type of “eating out”? Street stalls might be satellites or pop-ups of a farm.

Q12: Which non-food products made of upcycled food waste relate to the city / urban context are able to tell a story about its origin through digital information layers? How could the experience be? (How) can it be a strong story supporting a brand?

Q13:Which types of narratives using food / ingredients / cultivation / production data are able to create a relation to the product (and a strong user experience)? It might be the process of growing, or taking care, of the use of fertilizers etc. that can be “shared”.

Q14: How could urban citizen connect through local / peri-urban farming products and which new types of supply chain / distribution could emerge?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Your input, my comments:

Diana Samano Ramos

1) Should we need to find new rituals, habits or traditions to cook/eat/share food?

2) How explore gastronomic territories? Which are the role of food designers in the future? Could they help us to find new ways to be more open minded about food diversity and combat our unsustainable appetite?

 

Comment: Good to focus on the situation of “eating together”, either at a restaurant or at home / other places. The second question is indeed a series of questions, I suggest the following:

 

Q1: How can we design / change the situation of “common meals” at restaurants or in food stalls in order to connect people more to the food (its origin, its culture, its value…) they are eating?
consume
(and relate to produce)

 

Sarah Pearson

I have found some interesting material on existing products, which trigger a new way of recycling. It is not all about plastic, paper and tin, but also food waste!

  1. How can we challenge the idea of food up-cycling, by repurposing food waste as products useful for everyday life.
  2. Can we go back to our roots? How can we learn from traditional cooking methods in order to reduce food waste and encourage the use of local and seasonal ingredients.

Comment: As we discussed, the idea of waste re-use and upcycling is a thing we have in mind (and refer to) but we will not focus on. The second question allows some opportunities.

Q2: How can we design settings where people in cities connect to local and seasonal food and their production context? How could we use data and digital media to increase the possible impact of people engaged in CSA for them and their friends / community (both in relation to the ingredients used and the more efficient / less waste use)?
produce
(and relate to consumers)

Matea Varvodic / T

How can supermarkets inform/ enlighten consumers about the sustainability of their products (maybe sustainability index on packaging)? -> supermarkets should pre select sustainable products so that consumer does not have to do so

How can we nudge people to buy more sustainable products and how can we educate and motivate them about sustainability of certain products (trough design)? 

Comment: It is good to have one in the team who works with retail / POS, maybe broaden it to have both markets / supermarkets as places where to buy food. It seems to make sense to maybe focus on finding regional and seasonal products, both in supermarkets (broad range of products require information through labels etc) but also other activities allowing to connect to the origin.

Q3: How can we design and use data about food / ingredients to support people in selecting specific regional and seasonal food? This question should deal with different retail situations of food and work with specific examples of organic food allowing to connect to the origin of the food and dealing with different layers of information depending of the interest of the customer.
It adresses different situations with different contextual information needs.
distribute (and relate to producers)

Kalia Ruiz
  1. Are packages a real necessity for food to be properly provided? In which cases is packaging crucial and which could we avoid?
  2. Should we get back food traditions to produce less food/packaging waste?
  3. How can the vast agglomerations avoid supermarket food consumption?

Comment: I gave comments yesterday…I try to answer with a quite complex question allowing you to choose a focus!

Q4: Looking at regional and seasonal food, what are the opportunities to reduce or avoid packaging in retail situations in cities but in the same way provide necessary information about the products (goes together with Q3)? Are there services that enable change of the existing patterns of shopping regional and seasonal food in supermarkets (e.g. through engaging with the regional farmers through digital channels / platforms or through building communities)? Which new experiences and retail channels might emerge supporting local farmers?
distribute
(and relate to producers)

Anna Luz Joséphine Pueyo Kirwan  /T

1 : How can wasted by-products of the food production processes find a new meaning in the food distribution chain?

2 : How can new technologies find ways for the consumers to establish a lost relationship with products & producers?

3 :What meaningful contribution designers could bring to the block-chain technology?

Comment: I see a strong opportunity in 2&3 as they might be connected and suggest to focus on them.

Q5: Which possibilities emerge through emerging data technologies (like block chain) to establish a stronger relationship between people living in large cities and the food they buy and consume? Both types, regional and distant food will be explored for ways to connect both to the food and their production, cultivation, their value and the engaged people. What could this mean for interested people in the city?
consumer
(and relate to producers)

 
KOJIRO WATANABE

1, What are the characteristics and problems of food culture that is about food, tableware and lifestyle in Germany and Taipei?

2, How can we use SNS and digital technology to create a new local community for food?

Comment: I gave comments yesterday…

Q6: How can social media and digital platforms be used to create local communities of people living in big cities sharing an interest in local and regional food? Can specific characteristics of food culture support this process and which type of services or processes might emerge?
consumers
(and connecting them to each other)

 
María Becerra Martínez

What’s the best way to educate people about food cycles so that each phase can be improved?

Which type of design (industrial, graphic, etc.) would be the best to get an impact in a mega city about changing their food consumption? 

Comment: I gave comments yesterday…

Q7: How can we learn from the two phases of production and consumption in the food cycle in a way to better connect producers and consumers of food through a digital platform and build urban communities more aware of the value and origin of food, appreciating and enjoying food?
producers
(and relate to consumers)

Clara Schmeinck / T

1.How can organic farming methods improve the sustainability of food production on organic farms in the peri-urban area of Cologne or Taipei?

2.By using tech to improve processing and packaging, it can improve the shelf life and safety of food. How are the applied tech methods different in Cologne and Taipei and are they really necessary?

Comment: I gave comments yesterday…concerning  2: it is not clear if you are interested in processing and packaging tech or in opportunities to increase shelf life and safety?

Q8: How can CSA around Cologne and Taipei be more efficient and appealing to a broader community / audience, supported through activities and new services based on available data and digital platforms? How would this change the work at CSA (or new types of farming) in a sustainable way? Which new roles for both urban citizen and farmer emerge?
consumers
(and relate to producers)

Maxime Laika Charlotte Ridzewski

How can we reframe consumers’ expectations regarding the availability (abundance, variety, prize, quantity, time) of food in order to make them understand and accept a reduced permanent offer and/or less service in the food industry?

How can we create a closer, more direct and trust-based relationship between food-producers and consumers – based on more transparency regarding the supply chain, production and origin of food products – in order to increase the felt value of food products and to reach a more responsible behaviour towards the consumption and waste of food? (How) should we use digital technologies to reach this goal?

Comment: I gave comments yesterday… both questions go together. Please add detail to my question if you like, as you addressed quite a few relevant aspects. There really seems to be a focus on this question for many of you, but this helps to ideate and create a variety of emerging designs / opportunities!

Q9: How can we create value in limited availability of (local, seasonal) products, making them special and appreciate its very quality? What type of food might be a good example for that?
consumers
(and relate to product)

Sarah-Yasmine Aoufi

How much would replacing the old wrappings with a sustainably produced packaging affect the economy of a company?

What kind of food waste can be found in Taipei, considering the street stall culture and how does it differ from Cologne? Where would catering supplies made of waste make the bigger impact?

Comment: I gave comments in the meeting and I suggest to rethink the questions. The first question is very open and hard to investigate, the second question might focus on street stalls and culture around it…and relate it to our criteria. I don´t know what you think and how you feel about it, but maybe it works otherwise you are free for different suggestions.

Q10: How could the street stall culture in Taipei can become a unique pioneer (and new best-practice) in connecting to peri-urban food production / farms? Can the farm-to-plate principle, currently applied to more pricy restaurant, be applied to this very common type of “eating out”? Street stalls might be satellites or pop-ups of a farm.
consumers (and relate to producers)

Jeldrik Kirschbaum / T

Where is the leak of unsustainable and irresponsible waste or thinking of natural resources, in the sense of food, and why are there so few approaches on how to process this “waste” into novel products?

In which way can innovative inventions re-design our daily life with “wasted” food?

Comment: I also gave comments in the meeting and you need to give me a feedback how much you want to stick to the waste topic. If so, you could try to make something very visible through an intelligent type of “mis-use” or re-use that makes people think in general. And I think this topic is relevant to be researched and figures to be communicated but for me it is currently hard to anticipate a possible outcome unless you specify and narrow down to a situating, a specific type of packaging or a specific product, I need one more clarification from your side…

Q11: (tbd)

Kira Eßer

  1. Can food waste recycling into materials or other food become a standard of production and optimize people’s consumption? If so, which technological advances are necessary, for example, to process the production of soybeans?
  2. The biggest waste in food processing is in the tomato, fruit juice and wine industry, which is very common in Europe, and which comparisons can be found in Taipei?
  3. How can we reduce wastage in the production of food, such as juice production, such as the leakage of certain quantities?
  4. How are food waste processed in Taipei and in Cologne, where are the differences in processing?

For my research, I want to look at German and worldwide companies like Oatly, Dörrwerk, alpro etc. I want to trace back the single steps of the production and the further processing I have talked to an student of KISD, Jule Schacht, she did the intermediate about this topic and was a big help for that. Maybe an idea for some others of our project. I will print out my results for Monday. 

Comment: You need to relate this to cities and the criteria we fed back this Wednesday (see https://spaces.kisd.de/fcf2020/2019/11/06/recap-05-11/ )

Q12: Which non-food products made of upcycled food waste relate to the city / urban context are able to tell a story about its origin through digital information layers? How could the experience be? (How) can it be a strong story supporting a brand?
consumers (and relate to products and production)

 

Samia Rachid

  1. How can we educate people on the benefits and positivity of cellular meat, to help increase its demand?
  2. How would meat consumption change for Germany and Taiwan, if cellular meat is introduced to the market?

rephrase:

  1. How can we copy successful fact-based marketing (example: Oatly) and use it to create a campaign for conscious consumption, without making the consumer look like the culprit and have a more engaging conversation between local farmers and consumers? Are there any favours and or advice our local farmers would say to the consumer? Would it be possible to find financial support from the local cities if this was done in form of an ad campaign?
  2. Are there any common messages between farmers in cologne and Tapei in regards to what they would like their consumers to know?

Comment: I like the approach very much. It aims basically about knowledge of food and processes a farmer has and wants to share with his “customers” to better understand, use and appreciate his product. It might help to look at specific, very typic regional products both in Taiwan and German. And in a sense you are creating new “product experiences” or innovations through data layered narratives of a (less sustainable) product to be replaced by another, but through rational argumentation, but to a positive sensory experience.

This also helps all of us if you once would deeply investigate which data are related to a non-processed food product (vegetable , fruit,  crop etc.) and how this might become relevant! Think at high-priced products where it is all about distinction (wine, tea, coffee, cheese…) through labour- and knowledge-intensive processes. Every detail of production is relevant and contributes to the story! We share so many moments with people, other people share so many moments with us. Why not letting plants share their “moments” with us to create their story?

Q13:Which types of narratives using food / ingredients / cultivation / production data are able to create a relation to the product (and a strong user experience)? It might be the process of growing, or taking care, of the use of fertilizers etc. that can be “shared”.
consumers (and relate to products)

 

In the Atlas of Urban Expansion you can find relevant and interesting information about the development and character of Taipei…

I went through the questions of the 8 people submitting them by now. Please – ALL should submit their questions! We will discuss them tomorrow, and still some are very open and we need to find a stronger connections to our initial starting point(s) (tomorrow).

Tomorrow we will also go through your investigations of the 3 phases and the respective cases you found. I am really keen to see what you found out!

As we will have a short-noticed Prof-meeting tomorrow from 9-11 please meet anyway at 10 (as David will be there) and if you have time to extend the meeting max to 1400 it would be great. I will be there!

See you tomorrow!

 

Dear all, good to see all your questions emerging and I am looking so much forward to discuss them with you next Tuesday morning. Being here in Bogota and Medellin, I will for sure bring in some relevant contributions that might help us to focus. Please remember that we are having the framing of digitalisation that we want to address as well – to encourage thinking about alternative uses of data. I also received a very interesting not of a colleague, John Thackara, about an urban-rural exhibition he just opened last week in Shanghai. Projects like Alibaba live streaming are of interest to connect farmers…we will talk when I am back. Still need the time to go through all your questions!